|
Campaign Respect has been started up by a group of young people here at Youthlaw.
Those of us who started the campaign are sick of being treated disrespectfully by Authorised Officers (ticket inspectors) because we are young people.
Youthlaw also receives a lot of complaints from young people about their treatment by Public Transport Authorised Operators (AOs) or ticket inspectors. This ranges from disrespect and humiliation to verbal and physical abuse.
Its a grassroots campaign using info and digital activism to mobilise young people, hear your stories and bring about cultural, social and political change in the way ticket inspectors interact with young people.
OMBUDSMAN SAYS TICKET INSPECTORS USE EXCESSIVE FORCE
Public transport ticket inspectors have used excessive force on commuters and been given their jobs without proper screening, according to the Victoria Ombudsman, George Brouwer.
CCTV footage relied on by the Ombudsman highlighted a number of examples of inappropriate authorised officer conduct and use of excessive force, especially against yougn people
As a result of a damning report tabled in State Parliament in December 2010 by the Ombudsman, the Department of Transport has accepted all but one of 14 recommendations to overhaul the ticket inspector regime.
See "Other news" for more media reports or check out the Ombudsmans full report.
Ombudsmans Report December 2010
IF YOU WANT RESPECT MODEL IT: LATEST SURVEY RESULTS
An on line survey from 2010, documenting the experiences of some 274 young people with ticket inspectors by Youthlaws Campaign Respect found that over 70% of young people either agreed or strongly agreed that there is a problem with how authorised officers treat young people using public transport.
Other relevant findings from the surveys included:
- 35% had personally experienced aggressive or rude language by ticket inspectors
- 30% had personally experienced aggressive body language
- Nearly half had witnessed aggressive body language or rude language
- 18% had been physically handled themselves and 37% witnessed some other young person be physically handled.
Significant numbers of young people surveyed acknowledged that they had made a mistake i.e. did not validate ticket or inadvertently had feet on a seat and that the officer was obliged to report the infringement. What they often objected to was the way some officers, at times, went about their role in an impolite, aggressive and threatening way.
To check out what else the report says click here
If you want respect - model it
Post your (non offensive) comments below.
We will review your comment and may add it to our message board.
Do the right thing, and enjoy the ride.
Authorised Officers are no longer just ticket...
Authorised Officers are no longer just ticket inspectors. They check tickets to ensure compliance with the ticketing regulations (which require a person to obtain and validate a ticket before traveling, and yes, it is your responsibility to get the the station BEFORE the train, as running for the train is not a valid excuse) however they also provide the public with safety as a pro-active policing force in partnership with Transit Police. AO's undergo training in conflict management and arrest and takedown techniques. You can not be arrested for not having a ticket. However Authorised Officers have the same powers as police in regards to the Transport Act and its regulations and offences.
The Transport System is not a free service, and wether you like it or not, you have to pay for it (just like fast food). Nobody is forcing anyone to use the service (if they are seek legal advice) so don't use it if you don't like it. Whilst it maybe be perceived as "impolite, aggressive and threatening way" these 'threats' are called a 'Statement of Consequences' in law, and maybe required to be stated by AO's (which often will save you time and further fines, e.g. if they arrest you)
Intimidation through numbers
At Caulfield today, where I was suddenly...
At Caulfield today, where I was suddenly beset upon by a burly gang of individuals with no respect for anyone. A gang. Troubled youths? No, just the opposite. That's right, four ticket inspectors, with a few more nearby in case they need to overpower the three ten year olds I am taking out for the school holidays. Yes, we had tickets, yes they were concession tickets because they are children who are not yet 16. No, they do not need id they are children. Yes, you have succeeded in intimidating us with your aggressive body language and rudeness (I'm sorry, but I'm allowed to ask to see your id just as you are allowed to ask for me ticket in a paid area). Frankly, as gangs go, these ones are the ones to fear.
Be polite, and they'll be polite back.
I am a schoolkid who uses public transport...
I am a schoolkid who uses public transport (both train and tram) every morning and afternoon to get to school and back.
I have been asked to see my ticket on many occasions by many different inspectors, and have complied, and not once have any been even slightly rude. Once an inspector struck up a conversation with me while waiting for the tram, and actually apologised when we got on the tram and he asked to see my ticket, assuring me that he didn't think that anything was wrong, he just had to check.
On one occasion I left my yearly ticket at home, and the lady inspector told me it was okay, and didn't fine me.
Ticket inspectors are just doing their job, but many people are horribly rude. I have been shocked at some of the ways people speak to ticket inspectors, who are just doing their job. Ticket inspectors aren't the problem, it's the attitude towards ticket inspectors (and the idea that it's okay to not buy a ticket) that is the problem.
The law is the law
I find it very funny that people who can...
I find it very funny that people who can behave at home well or at work well cant behave the same way on transport. The way I see it is, that if you are nice to the AO's, than they are nice to you. They are law enforcers and have every right to arrest you if you do not comply with the Ticket Act of 1983.
The ONUS clause
it is on the onus of the ticket holder to...
it is on the onus of the ticket holder to hold a ticket they purchased whilst carrying documentation to prove said ticket is valid for the ticket holder.
if you are not carrying proof of concession, you need to purchase a full fare.
if you are under 17 a student card will suffice
if you cannot speak the language, learn the language to stop mistakes happening
ticket inspectors go through a very tough law course and training regimen, if you get abusive at them because you have abused the ONUS of buying a ticket, its your fault not theirs, if you give a false name i hope you get caught, if you do hold a correct ticket and valid id, you will even get a "have a nice day" and a thank you from them, I see people who are lax in carrying valid id, and serves them right for not providing proof and getting a fine, if you do have correct ID take a copy to the appeals section and they will usually drop it, I know they travel in bunches, this is because alone, they end up in hospital for doing their job, the youth that travel in bunches can and will break the law for a Laugh, even hospitalize people for doing their job, Every fine listed here is clearly valid.....
THE ONUS IS ON YOU, THE PASSENGER, TO CARRY DOCUMENTATION AND PURCHASE THE CORRECT FARE, now suck it up and live with it.
(These fines would be non existant if the ticket sellers asked for proof every time you bought a damn ticket, wouldn't it)
first page | 1 | 2 | 3 | last page
|
Click here for viewer contributions.
Click here for other news including:
Newspaper articles
Radio interviews
Press releases
Click here for other links
Click here to view information on how to make a complaint.
Click here to view your rights and authorised officers powers.
|